… If some of a manufacturer's
selection
criteria, taken individually, are not caught by Article 85(1), the cumulative effect of other networks does not alter that conclusion unless it is established either that there are barriers preventing access to the market by new competitors capable of selling the products in question, so that the
selective
distribution systems at issue have the effect of constraining distribution to the
advantage
of certain existing channels, or that there is no workable competition …
… Large retailers have in fact utterly transformed their marketing methods (see paragraph 59 above) and have succeeded not only in
protecting
the brand image attaching to technically advanced or luxury products but also in being competitive in terms of the image of those products.
63 However, the Commission left to the manufacturers the task of assessing public `perception' of a shop-name, the
environment
formed by the other goods and compliance with the `normal practice' in the sale of luxury products …
… In this case, paragraphs 40 to 46 of the judgment in Metro II must be interpreted to the effect that, if some of Givenchy's
selection
criteria, taken individually, are not caught by Article 85(1), the cumulative effect of other networks does not alter that conclusion unless it is established either that there are barriers preventing access to the market by new competitors capable of selling the products in question, so that the
selective
distribution systems at issue have the effect of constraining …