… In those decisions, the Commission had considered that an emission allowance was equivalent to an intangible asset the value of which was determined by the market and that, therefore, the fact that the State gave it to undertakings free of charge gave them an
advantage
; that by not selling the allowance, by auction for example, the State deprived itself of a resource, with the result that such an
advantage
implied a transfer of State resources; and that, finally, the
advantage
at issue was
selective
…
… Equally, in Community
environment
law, there are no provisions of primary or secondary law prohibiting a Member State - even as a precautionary measure, as is the case with the general prohibition in Article 87 EC - from adopting certain measures in the context of the implementation of Directive 2003/87 and the emissions allowances trading scheme. …
… On the contrary, under Article 176 EC, a Member State may maintain or introduce more stringent
protective
measures than are required by Community law as long as those measures are compatible with the Treaty in general (see, by analogy, Case C-6/03 Deponiezweckverband Eiterköpfe [2005] ECR I-2753, paragraphs 27 to 32).
113 The Court considers that the differences, referred to in paragraph 112 of the present order, between the procedure for reviewing State aid and the review of NAPs reveal a fundamental …