… Where the
selection
procedure is resumed, it is, on the other hand, incumbent on those bodies, when assessing the applicants’ merits, to ensure that they do not grant the interested parties an undue
advantage
. …
… The complaint was rejected on 30 September 2015.
27 In his application for interim measures, Mr Galocha had claimed, inter alia, that, if the disputed appointments were annulled and a new
selection
procedure organised, the agents who had been appointed would have the
advantage
of the theoretical and practical knowledge acquired since their appointment in the course of their duties. …
… According to Mr Galocha, there is also ‘a potential risk’ that, in the new
selection
procedure, Fusion for Energy would give the agents in question preferential treatment, as it would be
advantageous
to Fusion for Energy to recruit a candidate who had already acquired experience in the post to be filled.
28 The application for interim measures was dismissed by an order of 1 October 2015, Galocha v Joint undertaking Fusion for Energy (F-117/15 R, EU:F:2015:114), and the costs were reserved. …