search

… He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant parts of which read: Article 6 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . …

… In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing ... by an and by . ...” 21. The Government stated that the Tarsus Magistrates’ Court had used its discretionary power under section 28 § 4 of the Misdemeanours Act and examined the applicant’s objection without holding a hearing. …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . …

… ., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by .” Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention reads as follows: “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law. …

… In the determination ... of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing ... by an and by . ... 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... (d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him[.]” 17. The Government contested that argument. …

… They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which provides, insofar as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing ... by an and by .” A. Admissibility 16. The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that it is not inadmissible on any other grounds. …

… ., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by .” Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention reads as follows: “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law. …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by .” A. Admissibility 27. In the case of Petrenko and Others one of the applicants, Ms Agibalova lodged her application with the Court on behalf of her late husband, Mr V. Shvetsov, who passed away before bringing his case to the Court. 28. …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by .” A. Admissibility 28. The Government submitted from the outset that the domestic judgments in respect of some applicants had been executed in full prior to being quashed and they were not required to reimburse them afterwards (see “Enforcement status” in the Appendix). …

… The above provision reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 49. The Government contested that argument. A. Admissibility 1. Applicability of Article 6 of the Convention: the criminal head 50. …