search

… They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 92. The Government contested that argument. Admissibility 93. The Government objected that the available domestic remedies had not been exhausted. 94. …

… ., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by .” A. Admissibility 18. The Government argued that, as the applicant had failed to properly register his claim in the above-mentioned insolvency proceedings, his application to the Court was inadmissible on grounds of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. 19. The applicant maintained that he had complied with the exhaustion requirement. 20. …

… She relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” A. Admissibility 1. The parties’ submissions 21. The Government submitted that the applicant had failed to exhaust effective domestic remedies. …

… They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” A. Admissibility 38. The Government submitted that Article 6 of the Convention was not applicable to the contested proceedings, because the applicants had been charged with an administrative rather than a criminal offence. 39. …

… The Court must therefore ascertain whether the CAS could be regarded as an “ and by ” within the meaning of that Article and the principles laid down in paragraphs 138 to 144 above, at the time when it adjudicated the applicants’ respective cases. 149. …

… The relevant part of Article 6 § 1 reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” A.  Admissibility 1. The parties’ submissions 40.  Relying on the principles developed in Vilho Eskelinen and Others v.  …

… FIRST SECTION CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Applications nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 September 2018 Referral to the Grand Chamber 04/02/2019 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. TABLE OF CONTENTS PROCEDURE THE FACTS I.  THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.  Background B.  The secret surveillance schemes 1.  Government Communications Headquarters …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . … 2. Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. …’ B. EU law 1. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 5. …

… In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ... 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... …

… In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ... 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require; ...” 28. …

… In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... …