search

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ... ... 3.  Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... …

… In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by . ... 3.  Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... (d)  to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him[.]” 26.   …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations... everyone is entitled to a fair...hearing...by an and by .” A.  Civil proceedings before the Civil Court 1.  The parties’ submissions 76.  The applicant complained that the requirement to take a “supplementary oath” had amounted to a breach of his right to a fair trial. 77.   …

… The applicant company complained that the trial judge of the Kherson Suvorovsky District Court, who had examined the case concerning Article A at first instance, was not impartial and that that court had not been a “tribunal established by law” within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, of which the relevant part reads: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by …

… Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ...” A.  Admissibility 61.  It was the Government’s position that Article 6 was not applicable to the present case under either its civil or criminal head. …

… The applicants relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 22. The Government submitted that the CAO did not provide for the mandatory participation of a public prosecutor in each case concerning an administrative offence. …

… Therefore, his criminal charge had not been determined by a “tribunal established by law” as provided for by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the first sentence of which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by .” 73. The Government contested this argument. A. Admissibility 74. …

… In the determination of... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ... ... 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... (d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; ...” A. Admissibility 1. …

… In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing ... by an and by .” 116. The Government argued that the process of examining the applicant was entirely removed from any criminal investigation. …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by ... ... 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... …