search

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ...” 19.  The Government contested that argument. A.  The parties’ submissions 20.   …

… The applicant complained that Ch. had exerted undue pressure on the jury in contravention of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 18. …

… In the determination of... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by ... ... 3. …

… Legal context International law 3 Article 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950 (‘the ECHR’), provides: ‘In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by …’. 4 Under Article 41 of the ECHR: ‘If the Court finds that there has been …

… ., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ...” Furthermore, relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, he complained, in essence, about his personal liability for a debt of L.E. That Article provides: “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ... 3.  Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... …

… ., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by .” 20. The Government contested the applicants’ arguments. A. Admissibility 21. The Government did not contest that Article 6 applies in the applicant’s situation. The Court considers, in the light of its case-law, that this provision is applicable in the present case (see Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, § 90, ECHR 2012, Ternovskis v. …

… They relied on Article 6 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” A. Admissibility 29. The Government submitted that Article 6 of the Convention was not applicable to the impugned proceedings, because the applicants had been charged with an administrative rather than a criminal offence. …

… ., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ...” 69. On 8 April 2013 the Government submitted a unilateral declaration stating that they were prepared to acknowledge a violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as a result of the unreasonable length of the civil proceedings in which she had been involved. They also offered to pay her EUR 1,080 as just satisfaction. …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ... 3. …