search

… In the determination ... of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by ... 3.   …

… He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 12.  The Government contested that argument. In their opinion, there was no evidence that Judge K. being a colleague of the victim’s wife had affected his impartiality. …

… The applicant relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” A.  Admissibility 1.  The parties’ submissions 24.   …

… In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ... 3.  Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... …

… The applicants complained that the tribunal which had examined their cases had not been impartial in contravention of Article 6 of the Convention, which, insofar as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 9.  The Government contested that argument. …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” Article 10 “1.  Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. ...” …

… and by . …

… 2018 to the Council, that procedure, which had been ongoing since March 2014, was still at the preliminary investigation stage and had not been submitted to a Ukrainian court on the substance but at most, only in respect of procedural issues. 84 In that regard, it should be noted that Article 6(1) of the ECHR provides that in the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an …

… and by . …

… in May 2014 and referred to facts which allegedly occurred in 2010, were still at the pre-trial investigation stage and had been brought before a Ukrainian court for the consideration not of the substance but of, at most, mere procedural questions. 79 In that regard, it should be noted that Article 6(1) ECHR provides that in the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an …

… The applicant alleged, in particular, that she had not been given a fair hearing by an and by . She also alleged that her telephone communications had been tapped and that she had been subjected to surveillance measures, and that she had had no effective remedies in those respects. 4.  On 18 March 2011 the complaints under Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention were communicated to the Government. 5.   …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing ... by an and by .” A.  The parties’ submissions 1.  The Government 46.  The Government submitted that the civil limb of Article 6 of the Convention was inapplicable to the proceedings against the applicant, which had concerned the termination of her judicial office. 47.   …

… In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by . ... 3.  Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ... …