search

… /. …

… /, the latter does not provide the former with the requested information. …

… / has been implemented in the Belgian legal order by Article 6 of the law of 3 December 2017. …

… (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1), Directive 2016/680, but also Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters ( …

… 260(3) TFEU must be the same as that applied in the context of the procedure set out in Article 260(2) TFEU. 40 In the present case, taking into account, first, the importance of the provisions of EU law which have been disregarded, the protection of personal data being a fundamental right as is apparent from Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 16 TFEU, second, the existence of specific acts of EU law relating to the protection of personal data, namely …

… ., Facebook Belgium BVBA v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium)) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 7, 8 and 47 - (EU) / - Articles 55, 56, 58, 60, 61 and 66 - Supervisory authorities -Cross-border data processing - One-stop-shop - Lead supervisory …

… I propose that the Court answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium) as follows: - The provisions of (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) permit the supervisory authority of a …

… (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1). 3 OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31. 4 For the reasons set out above, see point 23 of this Opinion. 5 In that regard, the Court has consistently stated that, under Directive 95/46, the concept of ‘controller’ had to be construed …

… The referring court, which is hearing a constitutional complaint that has been brought before it, is seeking to assess the compatibility of the national law in question with (EU) / (3) (‘the GDPR’). 3. …

… cover situations of processing of personal data relating to penalty points recorded against drivers for motoring offences as provided for by a national law such as Article 141 (2) of the Ceļu satiksmes likums (the Law on motoring). (2) Article 5(1)(c) of / precludes a Member State from processing and communicating personal data relating to penalty points recorded against drivers for motoring offences. (3) Article 5(1)(b) and (c) of / precludes a Member State from …

… OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SZPUNAR delivered on 17 December 2020(1) Case C-439/19 B joined parties: Latvijas Republikas Saeima (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Constitutional Court, Latvia)) (Request for a preliminary ruling - (EU) / - Processing of personal data - Information relating to penalty points for road traffic offences - Concept of processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences - National rules providing for the disclosure …

… /. 126. …

… However, in such a case, the IP addresses would cease being personal data and / would not apply. (80) 131. By contrast, the recovery of claims in the prescribed manner by an assignee of those claims may constitute a legitimate interest justifying the processing of personal data in accordance with Article 6(1)(f) of /. …

… Finally, Articles 94 and 95 of / are worded as follows: ‘Article 94 Repeal of Directive [95/46] 1. Directive [95/46] is repealed with effect from 25 May 2018. 2. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 10 December 2020 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Personal data - (EU) / - Article 23 - Restriction of the rights of data subjects - Important financial interest - Enforcement of civil law claims - National legislation referring to provisions of EU law - Tax data concerning a legal person - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice) In Case C-620/19, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht …

… Erlbacher, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 3 September 2020, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 23(1)(e) and (j) of (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data …

… Similar concepts are to be found in (EU) /. (32) That contains a number of exclusions from its scope or states that data processing is lawful with regard to ‘courts acting in a judicial capacity’. Thus, the processing of certain categories of personal data, including sensitive data, is permissible where ‘processing is necessary … whenever courts are acting in their judicial capacity’ (Article 9(2)(f) thereof). …

… In the same way, supervisory authorities entrusted with monitoring the application of / are not competent to supervise processing operations of ‘courts acting in their judicial capacity’ (Article 55(3) of that regulation). These examples clearly suggest that the same activities would fall within the scope of that regulation if carried out in an ‘administrative capacity’. 83. …

… / provides: ‘Directive 95/46/EC is repealed with effect from 25 May 2018.’ 15 Article 99(2) of / provides that that regulation is to apply from 25 May 2018. …

… / 8 Recitals 32 and 42 of / state: ‘(32) Consent should be given by a clear affirmative act establishing a freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the data subject’s agreement to the processing of personal data relating to him or her, such as by a written statement, including by electronic means, or an oral statement. …

… The controller shall be responsible for, and be able to demonstrate compliance with, paragraph 1 (“accountability”).’ 11 In accordance with Article 6(1)(a) of /: ‘1. Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies: (a) the data subject has given consent to the processing of his or her personal data for one or more specific purposes; …’ 12 Article 7(1), (2) and (4) of / is worded as follows: ‘1. …

… (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1, ‘the GDPR’), provide for a higher level of protection for data in special categories, namely personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union …

… September 2019, XI v Commission, T-528/18, not published, EU:T:2019:594, paragraph 67). 64 It should also be borne in mind that both Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39), and …

… (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1, ‘the GDPR’), provide for a higher level of protection for data in special categories, namely personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union …

… September 2019, XI v Commission, T-528/18, not published, EU:T:2019:594, paragraph 67). 64 It should also be borne in mind that both Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39), and …