search

… Section 24(2) exempts the processing of personal data carried out solely for journalistic purposes from the application of a number of Articles of (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (see paragraph 48 below). Article 17 of the Regulation is not among the provisions concerned. Rehabilitation of convicted persons 38. …

… After the Court of Appeal had given its judgment in the present case, (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (“the GDPR”) repealed Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995. Article 17 of the GDPR provides as follows: Article 17 Right to erasure (“right to be forgotten”) “1. …

… The provisions of (EU) /, in particular Article 5(1), Article 6(1)(e) and Article 10 thereof, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which authorises the public body responsible for the register in which penalty points imposed on drivers of vehicles for road traffic offences are entered to disclose those data to economic operators for re-use. 4. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 22 June 2021 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - (EU) / - Articles 5, 6 and 10 - National legislation providing for public access to personal data relating to penalty points imposed for road traffic offences - Lawfulness - Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ - Disclosure for the purpose of improving road safety - Right of …

… Article 10 of (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), must be interpreted as applying to the processing of personal data relating to penalty points imposed on drivers of vehicles for road traffic offences. 2. …

… It is for the referring court to assess those particular circumstances. 112 In that regard, the mechanisms allowing the different rights and interests to be balanced are contained in / itself (see, by analogy, judgment of 29 January 2008, Promusicae, C-275/06, EU:C:2008:54, paragraph 66 and the case-law cited). 113 Moreover, in so far as the facts in the main proceedings seem to fall within both the scope of / and that of Directive 2002/58, the IP addresses processed …

… is a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society to safeguard: … (i) the protection of the data subject or of the rights and freedoms of others; (j) the enforcement of civil law claims.’ 21 Under Article 94 of /, entitled ‘Repeal of Directive [95/46]’: ‘1. …

… / 17 Article 4 of /, entitled ‘Definitions’, states in paragraphs 1, 2, 9 and 10: ‘For the purposes of this Regulation: (1) “personal data” means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (“data subject”); an identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or to one or more factors specific …

… /. …

… /, the latter does not provide the former with the requested information. …

… / has been implemented in the Belgian legal order by Article 6 of the law of 3 December 2017. …

… (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1), Directive 2016/680, but also Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters ( …

… 260(3) TFEU must be the same as that applied in the context of the procedure set out in Article 260(2) TFEU. 40 In the present case, taking into account, first, the importance of the provisions of EU law which have been disregarded, the protection of personal data being a fundamental right as is apparent from Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 16 TFEU, second, the existence of specific acts of EU law relating to the protection of personal data, namely …

… ., Facebook Belgium BVBA v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium)) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 7, 8 and 47 - (EU) / - Articles 55, 56, 58, 60, 61 and 66 - Supervisory authorities -Cross-border data processing - One-stop-shop - Lead supervisory …

… I propose that the Court answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium) as follows: - The provisions of (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) permit the supervisory authority of a …

… (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1). 3 OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31. 4 For the reasons set out above, see point 23 of this Opinion. 5 In that regard, the Court has consistently stated that, under Directive 95/46, the concept of ‘controller’ had to be construed …

… /. 126. …

… However, in such a case, the IP addresses would cease being personal data and / would not apply. (80) 131. By contrast, the recovery of claims in the prescribed manner by an assignee of those claims may constitute a legitimate interest justifying the processing of personal data in accordance with Article 6(1)(f) of /. …

… Finally, Articles 94 and 95 of / are worded as follows: ‘Article 94 Repeal of Directive [95/46] 1. Directive [95/46] is repealed with effect from 25 May 2018. 2. …

… The referring court, which is hearing a constitutional complaint that has been brought before it, is seeking to assess the compatibility of the national law in question with (EU) / (3) (‘the GDPR’). 3. …

… cover situations of processing of personal data relating to penalty points recorded against drivers for motoring offences as provided for by a national law such as Article 141 (2) of the Ceļu satiksmes likums (the Law on motoring). (2) Article 5(1)(c) of / precludes a Member State from processing and communicating personal data relating to penalty points recorded against drivers for motoring offences. (3) Article 5(1)(b) and (c) of / precludes a Member State from …

… OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SZPUNAR delivered on 17 December 2020(1) Case C-439/19 B joined parties: Latvijas Republikas Saeima (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Constitutional Court, Latvia)) (Request for a preliminary ruling - (EU) / - Processing of personal data - Information relating to penalty points for road traffic offences - Concept of processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences - National rules providing for the disclosure …

… JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 10 December 2020 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Personal data - (EU) / - Article 23 - Restriction of the rights of data subjects - Important financial interest - Enforcement of civil law claims - National legislation referring to provisions of EU law - Tax data concerning a legal person - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice) In Case C-620/19, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht …

… Erlbacher, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 3 September 2020, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 23(1)(e) and (j) of (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data …

… Similar concepts are to be found in (EU) /. (32) That contains a number of exclusions from its scope or states that data processing is lawful with regard to ‘courts acting in a judicial capacity’. Thus, the processing of certain categories of personal data, including sensitive data, is permissible where ‘processing is necessary … whenever courts are acting in their judicial capacity’ (Article 9(2)(f) thereof). …

… In the same way, supervisory authorities entrusted with monitoring the application of / are not competent to supervise processing operations of ‘courts acting in their judicial capacity’ (Article 55(3) of that regulation). These examples clearly suggest that the same activities would fall within the scope of that regulation if carried out in an ‘administrative capacity’. 83. …