search

… resold to an buyer, or if the products are not resold to an buyer, or not resold in the condition as imported, on such reasonable basis as the authorities may determine.’ 4 2.4 of that agreement reads as follows: ‘A fair comparison shall be made between the export price and the normal value. …

… Lastly, the request for the oral part of the procedure to be reopened referred to in paragraph 32 above does not reveal any new fact which is of such a nature as to be a decisive factor for the decision which the Court of Justice is called upon to give in this case. 35 Furthermore, as regards the request for the delivery of a ‘focused conclusion’, it should be recalled that, under the second paragraph of 252 TFEU, it is the duty of the Advocate General, acting with complete and …

… The third plea alleged infringement of 3(7) of the basic regulation, read in conjunction with 9(4) thereof, and of the right to sound administration, as well as manifest errors of assessment. …

… This directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular in 8 of the [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms] [(5)] and in the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. [(6)] … (4) Family reunification is a necessary way of making family life possible. …

… (5) Is national legislation that does not provide, as a step that must be taken before the refusal to grant or renew a residence permit as a reunited family member, for a specific procedure for hearing minors, where the grant or renewal of the sponsor’s residence permit has been refused, compatible with Article 15(3) and Article 17 of Directive 2003/86, Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) and (2) of the [ECHR] and Articles [7, 24 and ] and Article 33(1) of the []? …

… Children and minors whose legal representative is their sponsor shall obtain an residence permit when they reach the age of majority and are able to prove that they find themselves in one of the situations described in paragraph 1 of this or when they reach the age of majority after living in Spain for five years. …’ 17. …

… Advocate General’s Opinion (judgment of 25 October 2017, Polbud - Wykonawstwo, C-106/16, EU:C:2017:804, paragraph 23 and the case-law cited). 48 Under the second paragraph of 252 TFEU, it is the duty of the Advocate General, acting with complete and , to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on cases which, in accordance with the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, require the Advocate General’s involvement. …

… in 10 and Annex II.’ …

… (c) in referred to in point (b) where these have a non-nickel coating unless such coating is sufficient to ensure that the rate of nickel release from those parts of such coming into direct and prolonged contact with the skin will not exceed 0.5 μg/cm2/week for a period of at least two years of normal use of the . 2. which are the subject of paragraph 1 shall not be placed on the market unless they conform to the requirements set out in that paragraph. 3. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 22 February 2024 (*) (Appeal - State aid - 107 TFEU - Concept of ‘aid’ - Advantage - Private investor test - Arbitration award setting reduced electricity tariffs - Whether the arbitration award can be imputed to the State - Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - 4(2) - Decision that the measure does not constitute aid) In Joined Cases C-701/21 P and C-739/21 P, TWO APPEALS under 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought …

… Without prejudice to 10, the Commission shall take a decision pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3 or 4 of this . 2. Where the Commission, after a preliminary examination, finds that the notified measure does not constitute aid, it shall record that finding by way of a decision. 3. …

… Mytilinaios claims that the General Court thus distorted the content of that argument. 46 DEI replies, principally, that Mytilinaios’ first ground of appeal is manifestly inadmissible and manifestly unfounded. The argument in support of that first ground of appeal is worded in a vague and ambiguous manner. …

… in the effective application of [EU] law, he or she must guarantee his or her and [?] …

… :1034]), and the principle of judicial established in the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU and in Article of the of Fundamental Rights, as interpreted in the case-law of the Court of Justice (judgment of 27 February 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, C-64/16, EU:C:2018:117), be interpreted as meaning that those principles, in view of the possibility of pressure being exerted indirectly on judges and the possibility of the Public Prosecutor General issuing …

… (5) Must 6(1), (2), (3) and (7) and 18, in conjunction with 2(1) and [(3)] and recitals 11, 25 and 26, of [Directive 2016/800, and] 13 and recital 50 of [Directive 2013/48], be interpreted as meaning that a Member State must grant legal aid to suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings who were children at the time of the beginning of the proceedings but have subsequently reached the age of [18] and that such assistance is mandatory until the final conclusion …

… In that request, the applicant sets out the reasons why it considers that that regulation is contrary to the precautionary principle and to the European Union’s obligation to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, as set out in 9 and 11, 168(1) and 191(1) TFEU and 35 and 37 of the of Fundamental Rights, and as given concrete expression, so far as concerns plant protection products, by Regulation No 1107/2009, in particular …

… Law 19 In support of its action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging breach of the precautionary principle and of the European Union’s obligation to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, as set out in 9 and 11, 168(1) and 191(1) TFEU and 35 and 37 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and as given concrete expression, so far as concerns plant protection products, by Regulation No 1107/2009, …

… in particular 4 thereof. 20 The applicant’s single plea is divided into two parts. …

… 6b(5) of Delegated Regulation No 664/2014 provides in that regard that the national authorities remain responsible for the content of the standard amendment. It is, moreover, for the national authorities to verify that the amendments to the specification lodged with them comply with the applicable provisions, including, inter alia, ensuring that those amendments constitute standard amendments within the meaning of 53(2) of Regulation No 1151/2012. …

… Pursuant to 51(2) of Regulation No 1151/2012, nine of those notices of opposition were followed by reasoned statements of opposition, which the Commission received between 15 December 2015 and 24 December 2015. 10 After having examined the admissibility of those reasoned statements of opposition, the Commission invited all the interested parties, in accordance with 51(3) of Regulation No 1151/2012, to engage in appropriate consultations with a view to reaching an agreement. …

… Consideration of the requests to modify the application 20 On the basis of 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the applicants have lodged three successive requests to modify their application further to the publication of the first, second and third standard amendments to the specification. 21 The Commission submits that the requests for modification lodged by the applicants are inadmissible. 22 86(1) of the Rules of Procedure provides that, where a measure the annulment …

… 15 § 1 of Directive 2002/58, read in the light of 7, 8 and 11 and 52 § 1 of the . …

… of the . 88. …

… The CJEU found that a police officer in the legal system under consideration, who had been authorised to carry out a prior review of requests for access to data, had not fulfilled the requirements of and . 86. …

… of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), the obligation for the administration to give reasons for its decisions (judgments of 22 November 2012, M., C-277/11, EU:C:2012:744, paragraph 83, and of 4 April 2019, OZ v EIB, C-558/17 P, EU:C:2019:289, paragraph 52). …

… In so doing, the decision not to promote was allegedly adopted in breach of 41 of the and of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, assessed in the light of Article 7 of the Charter, Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and the general implementing provisions of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations of 16 December 2013, published in Administrative Notice No 55-2013 of 19 December 2013 (‘the GIP’). 54 Since the alleged irregularities, set out in the second complaint, arise, according to …

… Under 86(3) of those rules, in cases brought pursuant to 270 TFEU, the modification of the application must be made by separate document and within the time limit laid down in 91(3) of the Staff Regulations within which the annulment of the measure justifying the modification of the application may be sought. 28 Thus, when an implied decision is replaced by an explicit decision, after bringing an action, the applicant may request the annulment of the explicit decision by filing …

… - Single and continuous infringement - Geographic scope of that infringement - ‘Hybrid procedure’ leading successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision at the end of a standard procedure - 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to good administration - of the European Commission - Assessment of the geographic scope of a concerted practice - Relevant evidence - Classification of a series of acts as a ‘single and continuous …

… Scania’s national distributors sell the trucks that are bought from the headquarters to dealers which are either wholly owned subsidiaries or companies. …

… parties constituted a single and continuous infringement of 101(1) TFEU and 53 of the EEA Agreement for the period between 17 January 1997 and 18 January 2011. …