search

… The first and fourth to sixth grounds of appeal, alleging infringement of 296 TFEU, 18 of the SRM Regulation, the SRB’s duty of care, of the , 6 of the ECHR and the adversarial principle 1. The fifth ground of appeal (a) Arguments of the parties (b) Findings of the Court (1) Admissibility (2) Substance 2. …

… The seventh ground of appeal, alleging infringement of 17 and 52 of the and 5(4) TEU 1. Arguments of the parties 2. Findings of the Court (a) Admissibility (b) Substance D. The second ground of appeal, alleging infringement of 14 and 20 of the SRM Regulation, 39 of Directive 2014/59, the duty of care and 296 TFEU 1. Arguments of the parties 2. …

… Where an valuation in accordance with paragraph 1 is not possible, the Board may carry out a provisional valuation of the assets and liabilities of the entity referred to in 2, in accordance with paragraph 10 of this . 4. The objective of the valuation shall be to assess the value of the assets and liabilities of an entity referred to in 2 that meets the conditions for resolution of 16 and 18. 5. …

… Furthermore, as regards the alleged infringement of Articles 7, 8, 41 and of the , the Commission rightly observes that, since it is not substantiated, that argument cannot succeed. …

… 5(7) of the GIP for 45 of the Staff Regulations. It should be recalled that 5 of the GIP for 45 of the Staff Regulations, entitled ‘Promotion procedure’, provides as follows: ‘1. …

… She also criticises the appointing authority for not having examined the consequences of the irregularities caused by the presence in her file of her interim probation report on her subsequent appraisal reports for 2015 and 2016, in breach of 7, 8, 41 and of the . …

… Provisional text JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 26 September 2024 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - 57(1)(a) and (f) - Tasks of the supervisory authority - 58(2) - Corrective powers - Administrative fine - Discretion of the supervisory authority - Limits) In Case C-768/21, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under 267 TFEU from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden …

… Kranenborg, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 11 April 2024, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of 57(1)(a) and (f), 58(2) and 77(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive …

… the internal market. … … (10) In order to ensure a consistent and high level of protection of natural persons and to remove the obstacles to flows of personal data within the Union, the level of protection of the rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of such data should be equivalent in all Member States. … … (129) … The powers of supervisory authorities should be exercised in accordance with appropriate procedural safeguards set out in Union and Member State law, …

… Under the second paragraph of 252 TFEU, the Advocate General, acting with complete and , is to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on cases which require his or her involvement. The Court is not bound either by the Advocate General’s Opinion or by the reasoning which led to that Opinion. …

… of undertakings whose interests might be affected by the granting of aid, in particular the beneficiary of the aid, competing undertakings and trade associations.’ 6 32 of that regulation, entitled ‘Publication of decisions’, provides, in paragraph 3 thereof: ‘The Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union the decisions which it takes pursuant to 8(1) and (2) and 9.’ …

… Federal Republic of Germany in breach of 108(3) TFEU and was incompatible with the internal market; - the individual aid granted under the scheme in question did not constitute State aid if, at the time it was granted, it fulfilled the conditions laid down by a ‘de minimis’ aid regulation adopted pursuant to 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 of 7 May 1998 on the application of [107] and [108 TFEU] to certain categories of horizontal State aid (OJ 1998 L 142, p. 1); …

… Under the second paragraph of 252 TFEU, the Advocate General, acting with complete and , is to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on cases which require his or her involvement. The Court is not bound either by the Advocate General’s Opinion or by the reasoning which led to that Opinion. …

… The second plea alleged that there was no State aid within the meaning of 107(1) TFEU. The third plea claimed that the alleged aid was compatible with the internal market under 107(3)(b) TFEU and 107(3)(c) TFEU. …

… of undertakings whose interests might be affected by the granting of aid, in particular the beneficiary of the aid, competing undertakings and trade associations.’ 6 32 of that regulation, entitled ‘Publication of decisions’, provides, in paragraph 3 thereof: ‘The Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union the decisions which it takes pursuant to 8(1) and (2) and 9.’ …

… In this connection, first, in the light of the need to comply with of the , that procedure must ensure, to the greatest possible extent, that the adversarial principle is complied with, in order to enable the person concerned to contest the grounds on which the decision in question is based and to make submissions on the evidence relating to the decision and, therefore, to put forward an effective defence. …

… Where there is an arguable claim that the measure threatens to interfere with an alien’s right to respect for his or her private and family life, States must make available to the individual concerned the effective possibility of challenging the measure and having the relevant issues examined with sufficient procedural safeguards and thoroughness by an appropriate domestic forum offering adequate guarantees of and (see Gaspar v. …

… STRASBOURG 19 September 2024 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Trapitsyna and Isaeva v. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) 18 September 2024 (*) (Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Market for online search advertising intermediation in the EEA - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement - Exclusive supply obligation - Contractual restrictions) In Case T-334/19, Google LLC, established in Mountain View, California (United States), Alphabet Inc., established in Mountain View, represented by C. Jeffs …

… The third alleges that the investigation was biased. - Preliminary observations 99 41(1) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), enshrines the right to good administration and provides that every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled , fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union. …

… In particular, it sent to Qualcomm (i) a request for information dated 7 June 2010, adopted pursuant to 18(1) and (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in [101 and 102 TFEU] (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1), (ii) a request for information dated 3 November 2011, adopted pursuant to 18(3) of that regulation, (iii) a request for information dated 10 July 2013, adopted pursuant to 18(3) of that regulation …

… The Explanations relating to the , published in the Official Journal of the European Union of 14 December 2007 (OJ 2007 C 303, p. 17), state that that is based on the existence of the European Union as subject to the rule of law whose characteristics were developed in the case-law which enshrined good administration as a general principle of law (judgment of 13 December 2018, Transavia Airlines v Commission, T-591/15, EU:T:2018:946, paragraph 37 (not published)). 100 According to the …

… Rousseva, acting as Agents, having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of 1, 4 and 7 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), 2(h) and 3 of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or …

… Decisions for reduction or withdrawal of material reception conditions or sanctions referred to in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of this shall be taken individually, objectively and and reasons shall be given. Decisions shall be based on the particular situation of the person concerned, especially with regard to persons covered by 21, taking into account the principle of proportionality. …

… Provisional text JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Ninth Chamber) 12 September 2024 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Asylum and immigration policy - of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Scope - 1, 4 and 7 - Directive 2011/95/EU - Scope - 2 and 3 - National protection on humanitarian grounds - Directive 2008/115/EC - 14 - No possibility of carrying out the removal - Certification - Rights of an illegally staying third-country national in the event of postponement …

… 15(3) and 17 of Directive 2003/86, 6(1) and 8(1) and (2) of the [ECHR] and [7, 24 and ] and 33(1) of the []?’ …

… Hottiaux, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 7 March 2024, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of 15(3) and of 17 of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12), and 7 and 24, 33(1) and of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). 2 The request has …

… (5) Is national legislation that does not provide, as a step that must be taken before the refusal to grant or renew a residence permit as a reunited family member, for a specific procedure for hearing minors, where the grant or renewal of the sponsor’s residence permit has been refused, compatible with 15(3) and 17 of Directive 2003/86, 6(1) and 8(1) and (2) of the [ECHR] and [7, 24 and ] and 33(1) of the []? …