search

… ) . …

… The appellants responded that they are not asking the Court to introduce an actio popularis, but to interpret the fourth paragraph of 263 TFEU as applied to associations acting in their own name in the light of the principle of effective judicial protection as enshrined in 19(1) TEU and of the . (b) Assessment 137. …

… The reform shall result in a strengthening of the and of courts and judges established by law in accordance with 19 [TEU] and the relevant EU acquis. In accordance with 24(3) of [the RRF Regulation], any other reform shall be undertaken without weakening this result and negatively impacting the below elements.’ (35) 30. Milestone F1G relates to ‘F1.1 Reform strengthening the and of courts’. …

… (b)(ii) of the CEOS, applicable to the applicant by virtue of 119 of the CEOS; it also invited him to submit observations. 16 On 26 October 2020, the applicant requested that the HR.2 Division provide clarifications regarding the note referred to in paragraph 15 above. …

… The AECE examined them on the merits and concluded, as in the decision of 30 September 2022 rejecting the claim for compensation, that no illegality had been committed by the administration. Lastly, in paragraph 110 of the decision of 14 June 2023 rejecting the complaint of 23 December 2022, in the context of the examination of the second set of instances of alleged misconduct, the AECE found that the applicant had not challenged by a complaint within the meaning of 90(2) of the Staff …

… In the autonomous part of the decision of 14 June 2023 rejecting the complaint of 23 December 2022, the EEAS considered that the applicant had not challenged the decision relating to teleworking by means of a complaint within the meaning of 90(2) of the Staff Regulations, as recalled in paragraph above. 57 In the application, the applicant merely makes a very brief reference to the issue of teleworking in Brussels without citing paragraph 110 of the decision of 14 June 2023 rejecting the …

… The second plea in law, alleging infringement of 4 of Delegated Regulation No 664/2014 The applicant maintains that, as it was deprived of any opportunity to be heard concerning the amended application for registration, the Commission adopted the contested implementing regulation in breach of 4 of Delegated Regulation No 664/2014. …

… The first plea alleges breach of the right to be heard, contrary to 41(2)(a) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 (the ECHR). 22 The second plea alleges infringement of 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 664/2014 of 18 December 2013 supplementing Regulation No 1151/2012 with regard to the establishment of the Union symbols for …

… The first plea in law, alleging breach of the right to be heard 31 The applicant claims that there has been an infringement of the right to be heard within the meaning of 41 of the of Fundamental Rights, also protected by 6 ECHR. The right to be heard guarantees every person the opportunity to make known his or her views effectively during an administrative procedure and before the adoption of any decision liable to affect his or her interests adversely. …

… Although a conflict of interests is not, as such, listed as a ground for dismissal in 14.2 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB, it scarcely needs to be emphasised that the absence of conflicts of interests is inherent in the requirement that the tasks entrusted to the central banks be performed , (45) in much the same way as is implied by the requirement of the of judges (46) or of the members of the European Court of Auditors. () 94. …

… Banks and of the European Central Bank - Applicability - 130 TFEU - Principle of the of the national central banks) I. …

… At the same time, 130 TFEU and 7 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB - which, again, apply to all members of decision-making bodies of national central banks - enshrine the objective of their . …

… That right is expressly laid down in 41(2)(a) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - to which the Commission and the Portuguese Government refer in their observations - as a particular expression of the right to good administration. 48. …

… submitted, while maintaining the essential requirement of anonymity, which, as a guarantor of the of the assessment, must be considered inviolable. 43. …

… It is still, nevertheless, necessary to ascertain whether, before the jury adopts the evaluation decision, participants in design contests are entitled to a prior hearing on the basis of the right of every person to be heard before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken. . …

… Costs (Appeal - Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine - Decision 2014/145/CFSP - 1(1)(e) and 2(1)(g) - Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 - 3(1)(g) - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ - Plea of illegality - 7, 16, 17 and and 52(1) of the of Fundamental Rights …

… Grounds of appeal alleging that the General Court infringed the principle of proportionality and 52(1) of the , and the second part of the fourth ground of appeal in Case C111/24 P 1. The third ground of appeal in Case C696/23 P, alleging an infringement of the first sentence of 52(1) of the (a) Arguments of the parties (b) Findings of the Court 2. …

… of the European Union (‘the ’) were satisfied in the case before it. …

… 339 TFEU, as a result of it having disclosed the information provided to unauthorised persons, and of the right to good administration of justice recognised in 41 of the . …

… Forms of order sought 34 The applicants claim that the Court should: - order EIOPA to pay to each of them, by way of compensation for the non-material damage suffered as a result of the sufficiently serious breach of 339 TFEU and 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), the sum of EUR 15 000, together with compensatory interest calculated from 4 July 2019 at the rate defined by the European Central Bank (ECB); - order EIOPA to pay the costs. 35 …

… Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled , fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union. 2. …

… of the . …

… 19(1)] TEU and 6(1) to (3) TEU, read in conjunction with of the ? …

… courts from examining whether there is compliance with EU requirements concerning an and tribunal previously established by law within the meaning of 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with of the ?’ …

… and tribunal in proceedings that meet the requirements arising from [] of the []?’ …

… By the second part of its question, the referring court asks the Court, in essence, to examine whether the use of a computerised system for randomly allocating cases, such as the SLPS, is compatible with the requirements of an and tribunal established by law, for the purposes of the second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU, read in the light of of the . 57. …

… It asks whether the second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU, read in the light of of the , requires that the judge himself or herself have a judicial remedy against such decisions. 72. …

… Legal context European Union law The 3 of the , entitled ‘Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial’, provides: ‘Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this . Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law. …

… for more than one year’ - Single continuous period of one year - Person having received social welfare - Proof - Applicant’s right of access to the social welfare file of his former spouse - of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principle of good administration and right to an effective judicial remedy) In Case C-477/24 [Deldwyn], (i) REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under 267 TFEU from the Court of Appeal (Ireland), made by decision of 28 June 2024, received …

… /68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77, and corrigendum OJ 2004 L 229, p. 35), and of 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). 2 The request has been made in proceedings between I.T. …