search

… of the of Fundamental Rights. …

… unlawful replacement of the decision of 21 December 2023. - The first part of the second plea, relating to infringement of the principles of and in the conduct of the investigation procedure 45 The applicant argues that, both in the report at issue and in the contested decision, which validates the former, statements, complaints and evidence submitted by him were not examined, in breach of 22.1 and 27 of the Dignity at Work Policy and 41 of the …

… of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 46 The EIB disputes the applicant’s arguments. In that regard, it should be borne in mind that, under the first paragraph of 21 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the application initiating proceedings must contain a brief statement of the pleas in law on which the application is based. 48 According to settled case-law, the information given must be sufficiently …

… The Court also observes that it is not its task to substitute itself for the domestic courts as regards the assessment of the facts and their legal classification (see Rohlena, cited above, § 51), or to rule on the applicant’s individual criminal responsibility (see Kononov, cited above, § 187). . …

… STRASBOURG 27 January 2026 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Khadija Ismayilova v. …

… On 1 September 2015 the Baku Court of Serious Crimes acquitted the applicant of the charge under 125 (incitement to suicide) of the Criminal Code for lack of evidence and convicted her under 179.3.2, 192.2.2, 213.1 and 308.2 of the Criminal Code. It sentenced her to seven and a half years’ imprisonment and a ban on holding managerial and financial positions in public and local self-government bodies for a period of three years. …

… Until now, the possibility of relying on such a ground has been considered in relation to a risk of infringement of the fundamental rights guaranteed in 4 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment), 7 (right to respect for family and private life) and (right to an effective remedy before an and tribunal previously established by law) of the . 54. …

… I note, moreover, that, in its judgment in Procureur général près la cour d’appel d’Angers, the Court did not rule on whether a risk of breach of the principle of proportionality of penalties, provided for in 49(3) of the , could, on the basis of 1(3) of Framework Decision 2002/584, constitute an ground for refusal to execute a European arrest warrant. B. …

… The conclusions to be drawn from 1(3) of Framework Decision 2002/584 where there is a risk of breach of the principle of proportionality of penalties, enshrined in 49(3) of the 49. It follows from 1(3) of Framework Decision 2002/584 that that decision is not to have the effect of modifying the obligation to observe fundamental rights guaranteed by the . 50. …

… Wils, acting as Agents, having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of 26, 49 and 114 TFEU, 49 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), 3, 38 and 41 of Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts (OJ 2014 L 94, p …

… The legal framework European Union law The 3 49(1) and (3) of the provides: ‘(1) No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national law or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed. …

… from participation in public procurement procedures in the event of non-payment of that fine - 49 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Criminal nature of the penalty - Predictability and proportionality of that penalty - Principle of legal certainty) In Case C-590/24, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under 267 TFEU from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic), made by decision of 3 September 2024, received at the Court on …

… of that substance, in accordance with 37(1) and (2) of Regulation No 1272/2008. …

… Lastly, where the Commission finds that the harmonisation of classification and labelling of the substance concerned is appropriate, it is to adopt a delegated act, in accordance with 37(5) and 53a of that regulation, in order to amend Annex VI to that regulation by including, in Table 3 of Part 3 of that annex, the substance in question together with the relevant classification and labelling elements. 20 As regards the hazard of reproductive toxicity, 36(1)(d) of Regulation …

… Law 14 In support of their action, the applicants put forward three pleas in law, alleging: - first, infringement of 36(1)(d) and 37(5) of Regulation No 1272/2008 and of Sections 1.1.1.3., 1.1.1.5., 3.7.2.1.1. and 3.7.2.3.1. and Table 3.7.1(a) of Annex I to that regulation; - second, manifest errors of assessment; - third, breach of the principle of proportionality, of the rights of the defence and of the principle of good administration. …

… proceedings, which were of a quasi-disciplinary nature; 3) a breach of 178 § 1 of the Constitution, of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and 6 § 1 of the Convention in that the decision on his transfer had infringed his judicial and breached the prohibition on the arbitrary transfer of a judge from one division to another. 19. …

… Turkey, CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD000157107, §§ 63 and 96). 117 In the light of the foregoing, it must be held that the requirement of judicial arising from second subparagraph of 19(1) [of the Treaty on European Union], read in the light of of the , requires that the rules applicable to transfer without the consent of such judges present, like the rules governing disciplinary matters, in particular the necessary guarantees to prevent any risk of that …

… , or certain of them, have in fact been established, it remains, in any event, in order to ensure the possibility of an effective judicial remedy in respect of a decision to transfer a judge without consent, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, necessary for an and tribunal established by law to be able, in accordance with a procedure that fully safeguards the rights enshrined in and 48 of the , to review the validity of that decision and that of …

… . …’ 5 of the , entitled ‘Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial’, states: ‘Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this . …

… Tomassi, acting as Agents, having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of 41 and of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’) and 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950 (ECHR). 2 The request has been made in proceedings between …

… to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matter of those proceedings or of the number of undertakings concerned - General principle of the right to good administration - of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principle of effective judicial protection - Rights of defence of undertakings - Principle of effectiveness) In Case C-588/24, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under 267 TFEU from the Consiglio …

… In the absence of specific guidance in Directive 2016/343 and in the case-law concerning 48(1) of the as to how to determine whether a person is presented as being guilty in a judicial decision, we should turn primarily to the case-law of the ECtHR. (11) (i) The case-law of the ECtHR . …

… The request for a preliminary ruling, made in the context of criminal proceedings against AC for slander, relates more specifically to the interpretation of 4 and 6(1) of Directive (EU) 2016/343 (4) and 48 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). II. Legal context A. European Union law 4. …

… It seems to me that such a measure is based less on 4(2) of Directive 2016/343 concerning appropriate measures than on the primacy of the presumption of innocence under 48(1) of the and 3 of that directive. 102. …

… The second plea in law, alleging breach of the obligation to state reasons 35 The applicant claims that the statement of reasons given by the Council as the basis for including and maintaining his name on the lists at issue does not satisfy its obligation under the second paragraph of 296 TFEU and 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). …

… Preliminary points 170 It should be recalled that the effectiveness of the judicial review guaranteed by of the requires, in particular, that the Courts of the European Union ensure that the decision by which restrictive measures were adopted or maintained, which affects the person or entity concerned individually, is taken on a sufficiently solid factual basis. …

… In essence, the applicant submits that the inclusion of a person’s name on the lists at issue on the sole ground of his or her family membership is of any personal conduct and therefore precludes any possibility of removal from those lists. …

… 32 § 1 (7) of Decree no. 600/1973, concerning the assessment of income taxes, reproduces the provision set out in 51 § 2 (7) of Decree no. 633/1972 in relation to the assessment of value-added tax (VAT) (see paragraph 7 above). 10. 43 reiterates the same time-limits for issuing a tax assessment notice as those set out in 57 of Decree no. 633/1972 (see paragraph 8 above). …

… Article of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, read in conjunction with Articles 7 and 8 and Article 52(1) thereof, must be interpreted as: – precluding legislation of a Member State implementing the procedure for the exchange of information on request established by Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC, as amended by Council Directive 2014/107/EU of 9 December 2014, which …

… (i) any other act which the law expressly states can be challenged . ... 2. Acts other than those expressly provided for cannot be challenged . Any act that can be challenged may be challenged solely on the basis of its own irregularities ...” Law no. 212 of 27 July 2000 (the Act on Taxpayers’ Rights) 12. The relevant provisions of Law no. 212/2000 read as follows: Section 13: Taxpayer’s Guarantor “1. …