search

… Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national competent authorities and with national designated authorities, and 41 § 2 of the . …

… In their view, the refusal to grant them standing, coupled with the Supreme Administrative Court’s earlier refusals to do so (see paragraphs 31, 41 and 44- above), meant that the BNB’s decision to withdraw KTB’s licence would remain without any judicial scrutiny. 80. Bulgarian Acquisition Company II Sarl lodged a similar appeal. It likewise argued that it had standing to appeal under EU law, 6 § 1 and 14 of the Convention, and 1 of Protocol No. 1. …

… These aspects of the case raise issues under 6 § 1 of the Convention and 1 of Protocol No. 1. 2. The case also concerns the fact that in the proceedings in which the bank was declared insolvent and ordered to be wound up, it was represented by persons alleged to be dependent on the opposing party. This second aspect of the case raises issues under 6 § 1 of the Convention. THE FACTS 3. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 1 August 2022 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - 7, 8 and 52(1) - Directive 95/46/EC - 7(c) - 8(1) - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Point (c) of the first subparagraph of 6(1) and the second subparagraph of 6(3) - 9(1) - Processing necessary for compliance with a legal obligation …

… , of guaranteeing the of the decisions taken, and of preventing corruption from emerging and spreading in the public service. 25 Pursuant to 2(1) of the Law on the reconciliation of interests, the term ‘persons working in the public service’ covers, amongst others, persons who work in public associations or establishments that receive finance from the budget or from funds of the State or of a local authority and who are vested with administrative powers. 26 3 of the Law …

… , and also with regard to 7 and 8 of the , be interpreted as meaning that national law may not require the disclosure of declarations of private interests and their publication on the website of the controller (the [Chief Ethics Commission]), thereby providing access to those data to all individuals who have access to the internet? …

… First, respect for the rights of the defence, guaranteed by 41 and 48 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), required that the Council hear the applicant before adopting those acts, or at least allow it to submit comments, after having had access to the case file. …

… Second, respect for the right to effective judicial protection, guaranteed by of the , required that the applicant be able to ascertain the grounds on which the Council proposed to base its decision to include the applicant’s name on the lists at issue before it adopted that decision. 66 In the applicant’s submission, the contested acts undeniably undermine its interests, in a serious and irreversible manner, giving rise to dramatic economic, financial and human consequences, since …

… It shall contribute to peace, security … as well as to the strict observance and the development of international law, including respect for the principles of the United Nations .’ 49 As regards the contested decision, it should be observed that this is based on 29 TEU. …

… States should ensure that guardians enjoy the and appropriate to their role. Principle 5 – Information, access to justice and remedies, including child-friendly complaint mechanisms States should ensure that unaccompanied and separated children in migration are provided with relevant information and advice, and that they have access to an complaint mechanism and remedies to effectively exercise their rights or act upon violations of their rights. …

… Further parts containing some important provisions relating to the treatment of unaccompanied minors were later added to Legislative Decree no. 142 of 18 August 2015 by Law no. of 7 April 2017, which entered into force on 6 May 2017 (see paragraph 48 below). These new parts are indicated in the footnotes to the concerned (see paragraph below). 44. …

… Law no. of 7 April 2017 - Provisions concerning the protection of unaccompanied minors 48. This Law aims at ensuring foreign unaccompanied minors all the rights granted to minors of Italian or European Union nationality, with consideration in particular for their increased vulnerability ( 1). 49. The different phases of the age-assessment procedure have been summarised in the new 19 bis and in the new paragraphs of 18 and 19 of Legislative Decree no. 142 of 2015. 50. …

… and Fundamental Freedoms, (19) to which the second paragraph of of the corresponds. 37. …

… According to the Explanations relating to the of Fundamental Rights, (63) the second paragraph of of the corresponds to 6(1) ECHR. The Court must, therefore, ensure that the interpretation which it gives to the second paragraph of of the safeguards a level of protection which does not fall below the level of protection established in 6(1) ECHR, as interpreted by the ECtHR. (64) 100. …

… The requirement of a ‘tribunal established by law’ and the requirements of ‘’ and ‘’ of a tribunal form part of the ‘institutional requirements’ of 6(1) ECHR. In the case-law of the ECtHR, there is a very close interrelationship between those requirements. (65) 101. …

… The third plea, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons 20 The applicant submits that the contested appraisal report is vitiated by an infringement of the obligation to state reasons, as flows from the second paragraph of 296 TFEU, the second paragraph of 25 of the Staff Regulations and 41(2)(c) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. …

… in respect of the contested appraisal report. 12 On 8 July 2021, the AECE adopted the decision rejecting the complaint. 13 On 14 July 2021, the applicant submitted a request for assistance under 24 of the Staff Regulations. …

… Background to the dispute 2 The applicant was a member of the temporary staff, pursuant to 2(b) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘the CEOS’), at grade AD 7 in the Commission between 16 November 2017 and 15 November 2020. …

… ORDER OF THE COURT (Eighth Chamber) 12 July 2022 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - 1(3) - Surrender procedure between Member States - Conditions for execution - of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Second paragraph of - Fundamental right to a fair trial before an and tribunal …

… that, having regard inter alia to the information provided by that person relating to the composition of the panel of judges who heard his or her criminal case or to any other circumstance relevant to the assessment of the and of that panel, there has been a breach of that person’s fundamental right to a fair trial before an and tribunal previously established by law, enshrined in the second paragraph of of the of Fundamental Rights …

… of the Polish courts concerned, which is a separate question from whether those courts were previously established by law within the meaning of the second paragraph of of the . 9 According to the applicants in the main proceedings, if those courts were not established by law, there would be no need to determine whether they are or . …

… of the . …

… JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Ninth Chamber) 7 July 2022 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU - Obligation on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law - 267 TFEU - Obligation on the referring court to give full effect to the interpretation of EU law provided by the Court of Justice - of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - - Access to an and …

… Sjödin, acting as Agents, having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of 4(3) and 19(1) TEU, and of 2(1) and (2), and 267 TFEU, read in the light of of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). 2 The request has been made in four sets of proceedings between, respectively, F. …

… 41 of the . …

… Accordingly, the decision not to adopt such tools, some of which may enable the applicant to continue part of its activities, produces binding legal effects such as to affect the interests of the applicant. 35 Lastly, as is also apparent from the Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona in Joined Cases ABLV Bank and Others v ECB (C-551/19 P and C-552/19 P, EU:C:2021:16, point 93), observance of the right to effective judicial protection, enshrined in of the of Fundamental …

… Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), is ensured by the fact that the SRB’s decision which concludes the procedure referred to in 18 of Regulation No 806/2014 is an act that is open to challenge, with the result that any unlawfulness vitiating the ECB’s FOLTF assessment, which is carried out at the first stage of the procedure, can be relied upon in support of an action against that decision of the SRB. …

… The second plea in law, alleging, first, a manifest error of assessment and infringement of 2(6a), (8), (10) and (11), 3, 6, 9(6) and 18(1) and (3) of the basic regulation and of paragraph 3 of Annex II to the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement and, secondly, infringement of 2 and 3, 6(6) and (8), 9(4) and 18(1) and (3) of the basic regulation and paragraph 3 of Annex II to the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement 31 The second plea in law is …

… By the third part, the applicants complain that the Commission failed to calculate the normal value and used the available data in order to determine their dumping margin. - The first and second parts of the second plea, alleging a manifest error of assessment and infringement of 2(6a), (8), (9), (10) and (11), 3, 6, 9(6) and 18(1) and (3) of the basic regulation and paragraph 3 of Annex II to the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement 33 By the first two parts of the …

… were heard for the first time by the hearing officer on 23 August 2019 as regards the possible application of 18 of the basic regulation. …