search

… circumstances, to a violation of the guarantees of and within the meaning of 45 § 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and 6 § 1 of the [Convention]. 3. …

… They maintained that the Disciplinary Chamber could not be regarded as an and tribunal established by law within the meaning of 45 of the Constitution, of the of Fundamental Rights and 6 of the Convention. 25. On 23 December 2019 M.G., the First President of the Supreme Court replied that the request of the applicant’s lawyers had been received on 20 December, while the case was to be heard on 23 December 2019. …

… in conjunction with 187 § 1 and 3 of the Constitution, – the first sentence of 6 § 1 of the Convention. – , first and second sentences, of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in connection with 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union.” 102. …

… Unlike its predecessor, Directive 95/46/EC, (4) the GDPR was adopted on the basis of 16 TFEU. (5) That legal basis empowered the EU legislature to safeguard the fundamental right to protection of personal data, provided for in 8(1) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). (6) 17. …

… : … (f) the protection of judicial and judicial proceedings; …’ B. …

… The exclusion of the competence of supervisory authorities over courts when they act in their judicial capacity, set out in 55(3) of the GDPR, does not affect the previous conclusion. Quite to the contrary, to my mind, that provision confirms that courts acting in their judicial capacity are subject to the obligations imposed by the GDPR. It safeguards their and by prohibiting oversight by a supervisory body of their processing operations. 32. …

… In support of that action, PV put forward seven pleas in law inter alia alleging, first, infringement of 12a of the Staff Regulations, second, infringement of 21a and 23 of the Staff Regulations and of the principles of legality and validity of administrative measures, third, infringement of 11a of the Staff Regulations and of 41(1) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), fourth, infringement of the principle of the duty of care …

… In accordance with 76(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court has decided to proceed without a hearing. B. Forms of order sought 46. The appeal was lodged by PV on 23 November 2020 and was entered in the Court Register on 30 November 2020. PV claims that the Court should: - set aside the judgment under appeal; - rule on the dispute; and - order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings at both instances. . …

… Considering himself to be a victim of harassment, PV submitted, on 5 August 2009, a request for assistance on the basis of 24 and 90(1) of the Staff Regulations. …

… Under section -1 of the Information Act ...value judgments are not subject to retraction or proof of veracity. ... …

… Section 26 Rights and obligations of staff journalists “In accordance with the principles of professional , journalists shall exercise rights and perform obligations established by the Information Act (no. 2657‑12) and this Act. ... …

… The relevant extracts from the Information Act provide as follows: Section Liability for the infringement of the legislation on information “... Liability for the infringement of the legislation on information shall be borne by persons responsible for the following infringements: ... dissemination of information that does not correspond to reality, defames the honour and dignity of a person ...” Section -1 Indemnity from liability “No one may be held liable for making value judgments. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) 14 September 2022 (*) (Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Smart mobile devices - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement - Concepts of multi-sided platform and market (‘ecosystem’) - Operating system (Google Android) - App store (Play Store) - Search and browser applications (Google Search and Chrome) - Agreements with device manufacturers and mobile network operators - Single …

… of assessment and misuse of powers, breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials and breach of the principle of good administration; - third, infringement of 41(1) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’) and breach of the rules of objectivity and ; - fourth, infringement of the second paragraph of 296 TFEU, the second paragraph of 25 of the Staff Regulations and 41(2) of the . 22 At the hearing …

… That guarantee is effective only if that second person adopts a truly objective and approach, which is not the case here given the comments made even before the appeal was brought. The Commission disputes the applicant’s arguments. 48 With regard to the lack of and objectivity on the part of the reporting officer, it should be noted that, under 41(1) of the , every person has the right, inter alia, to have his or her affairs handled impartially by the institutions …

… The applicant submits that the head of unit made comments which were beyond a ‘certain irritation’, which shows that he was not capable of carrying out his role as reporting officer objectively and pursuant to 41(1) of the . …

… Rules of Procedure make no provision for parties to submit observations in response to the Advocate General’s Opinion (judgment of 15 July 2021, Commission v Poland (Disciplinary regime for judges), C-791/19, EU:C:2021:596, paragraph 41). 41 Second, under the second paragraph of 252 TFEU, the Advocate General, acting with complete and , is to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on cases which, in accordance with the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European …

… States in the euro area - 130 TFEU and 7 of that protocol - - Disclosure of confidential information) In Case C-45/21, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under 267 TFEU from the Ustavno sodišče (Constitutional Court, Slovenia), made by decision of 14 January 2021, received at the Court on 28 January 2021, in the proceedings Banka Slovenije, other party: Državni zbor Republike Slovenije, THE COURT (Grand Chamber), composed of K. …

… the responsibility assumed by the Central Bank of Slovenia in place of the Slovenian authorities could be equated with a form of financing of those authorities, and with the principle of the of central banks under 130 TFEU and 7 of the Protocol on the ESCB and the ECB. 27 Furthermore, that court notes that the ZPSVIKOB lays down rules relating to the automatic disclosure, to all potential complainants and their representatives, of certain confidential documents which …

… Although those objectives are set out in 35 and 37 of the of Fundamental Rights, and the Court, at least in relation to 37, has already referred to a ‘right’ within the meaning of 52(2) of the for which provision is made in the Treaties, (10) the conditions for emergency authorisation are in fact unlikely to constitute a concrete manifestation of the limitations to fundamental rights as provided for in the second sentence of 52(1) of the . …

… Although the Conseil d’État (Council of State) raises that question only in the event that the Court answers the first question in the affirmative, it seems appropriate to discuss it of that question. 53. …

… Under 28(1) of the Plant Protection Regulation, a plant protection product requires authorisation by the Member State concerned. Pursuant to 29, that authorisation requires, inter alia, that the Commission has approved its active substances, safeners and synergists in accordance with 4 to 13. 25. However, 53(1) of the Plant Protection Regulation allows Member States to authorise other plant protection products in emergencies. 26. …

… , that IDOC is not or . …

… The first plea in law alleges breach of the duty of care and of the principle of good administration enshrined in 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). The second plea in law alleges, first, failure to comply with the reasonable time requirement, breach of the principle of legal certainty and infringement of 12a of the Staff Regulations and, second, a manifest error of assessment. 1. …

… Lastly, as regards the applicant’s claim that ‘[the Director-General of DG Human Resources] admitted in a meeting in front of colleagues of IDOC that she [had] not [replied] to multiple [] 90 requests submitted to her [by the applicant]’, it should be stated that that claim is not substantiated. 108 In the light of the foregoing, the applicant’s argument alleging that the appointing authority and IDOC were not or must be rejected. (3) The alleged failure to comply with …

… no content since its scope is not different from that of the decision to remove from post. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber) 7 September 2022 (*) (Civil service - Temporary staff - Disciplinary regime - Removal from post - Opening of an administrative investigation - Initiation of disciplinary proceedings - Requirement for - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - 11, 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations - Duty of loyalty - Legal certainty - Freedom of expression - 11 of the of Fundamental Rights - Principle of sound administration …

… This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers’. 87 Furthermore, 52(1) of the provides that any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by the must be provided for by law and respect the essential content of those rights and freedoms. …