search

… That right is expressly laid down in 41(2)(a) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - to which the Commission and the Portuguese Government refer in their observations - as a particular expression of the right to good administration. 48. …

… submitted, while maintaining the essential requirement of anonymity, which, as a guarantor of the of the assessment, must be considered inviolable. 43. …

… It is still, nevertheless, necessary to ascertain whether, before the jury adopts the evaluation decision, participants in design contests are entitled to a prior hearing on the basis of the right of every person to be heard before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken. . …

… Costs (Appeal - Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine - Decision 2014/145/CFSP - 1(1)(e) and 2(1)(g) - Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 - 3(1)(g) - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ - Plea of illegality - 7, 16, 17 and and 52(1) of the of Fundamental Rights …

… Grounds of appeal alleging that the General Court infringed the principle of proportionality and 52(1) of the , and the second part of the fourth ground of appeal in Case C111/24 P 1. The third ground of appeal in Case C696/23 P, alleging an infringement of the first sentence of 52(1) of the (a) Arguments of the parties (b) Findings of the Court 2. …

… of the European Union (‘the ’) were satisfied in the case before it. …

… 339 TFEU, as a result of it having disclosed the information provided to unauthorised persons, and of the right to good administration of justice recognised in 41 of the . …

… Forms of order sought 34 The applicants claim that the Court should: - order EIOPA to pay to each of them, by way of compensation for the non-material damage suffered as a result of the sufficiently serious breach of 339 TFEU and 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), the sum of EUR 15 000, together with compensatory interest calculated from 4 July 2019 at the rate defined by the European Central Bank (ECB); - order EIOPA to pay the costs. 35 …

… Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled , fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union. 2. …

… of the . …

… 19(1)] TEU and 6(1) to (3) TEU, read in conjunction with of the ? …

… courts from examining whether there is compliance with EU requirements concerning an and tribunal previously established by law within the meaning of 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with of the ?’ …

… and tribunal in proceedings that meet the requirements arising from [] of the []?’ …

… By the second part of its question, the referring court asks the Court, in essence, to examine whether the use of a computerised system for randomly allocating cases, such as the SLPS, is compatible with the requirements of an and tribunal established by law, for the purposes of the second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU, read in the light of of the . 57. …

… It asks whether the second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU, read in the light of of the , requires that the judge himself or herself have a judicial remedy against such decisions. 72. …

… Legal context European Union law The 3 of the , entitled ‘Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial’, provides: ‘Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this . Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law. …

… for more than one year’ - Single continuous period of one year - Person having received social welfare - Proof - Applicant’s right of access to the social welfare file of his former spouse - of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principle of good administration and right to an effective judicial remedy) In Case C-477/24 [Deldwyn], (i) REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under 267 TFEU from the Court of Appeal (Ireland), made by decision of 28 June 2024, received …

… /68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77, and corrigendum OJ 2004 L 229, p. 35), and of 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). 2 The request has been made in proceedings between I.T. …

… Third, the Advocate General addressed in his Opinion issues which were not discussed between the parties in their written observations, such as, in particular, the risk of circumvention of freezing measures. 27 In that regard, it should be noted that, under the second paragraph of 252 TFEU, it is the duty of the Advocate General, acting with complete and , to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on cases which, in accordance with the Statute of the Court of Justice …

… the object or effect of which is to circumvent the measures referred to in 2.’ …

… Such approval is granted at a meeting. 14 In accordance with STAK’s management , all depositary receipt holders with voting rights are allowed to attend and intervene in person, or to be represented, at such a meeting. …

… According to 5 (‘Coordination committee’): ‘1. …

… 8 (‘Process of slot allocation’) provides: ‘… 5. …

… 5(1)(a), 5(3), and 8(5) - Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 - Power to adopt national rules at coordinated airports - 19(1) - Limitation on Member States in placing restrictions on the use of schedules facilitated airports for VFR flights) 1. …

… Regarding, more specifically, that body’s , that order explains that that body, inasmuch as it is not subject to any hierarchical constraint and does not receive instructions from third parties, carries out its functions objectively, and entirely autonomously. 27 Secondly, as regards the compulsory nature of its jurisdiction, within the meaning of the Court’s case-law on 267 TFEU, the Court has already held that the decisions of the administrative boards of contract …

… in the framework of the provision of services (OJ 1997 L 18, p. 1), 56 TFEU, and 28 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). 2 The request has been made in proceedings between the Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia (AESTE) and the Ayuntamiento de Ortuella (Municipal Authority of Ortuella, Spain) concerning the lawfulness of an award criterion set out in the tender specifications for a contract for services procured by that authority …

… [(2)] Does such an award criterion conflict with the freedom to provide services or restrict free competition, contrary to 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Directives [2014/24] and [96/71]? [(3)] Does such an award criterion infringe the right of collective bargaining recognised in 28 of the []?’ …

… Those provisions confirm that courts are subject, when acting in their judicial capacity, to the obligations imposed by Directive 2016/680, albeit their and are preserved in that context. (15) 34. In addition, judicial authorities are expressly mentioned in recital 11 of Directive 2016/680, which states that ‘such competent authorities may include … public authorities such as the judicial authorities’. …

… Indeed, in accordance with 32(1) of that directive, Member States must provide for controllers to designate a data protection officer, but may exempt courts and other judicial authorities from that obligation ‘when acting in their judicial capacity’. …

… Consequently, the referring court has doubts as to whether 272(1) of the NPK satisfies the requirements laid down in 4(1)(c) and 8(1) of Directive 2016/680. …