search

… In that request, the applicant sets out the reasons why it considers that that regulation is contrary to the precautionary principle and to the European Union’s obligation to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, as set out in 9 and 11, 168(1) and 191(1) TFEU and 35 and 37 of the of Fundamental Rights, and as given concrete expression, so far as concerns plant protection products, by Regulation No 1107/2009, in particular …

… Law 19 In support of its action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging breach of the precautionary principle and of the European Union’s obligation to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, as set out in 9 and 11, 168(1) and 191(1) TFEU and 35 and 37 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and as given concrete expression, so far as concerns plant protection products, by Regulation No 1107/2009, …

… in particular 4 thereof. 20 The applicant’s single plea is divided into two parts. …

… 15 § 1 of Directive 2002/58, read in the light of 7, 8 and 11 and 52 § 1 of the . …

… of the . 88. …

… The CJEU found that a police officer in the legal system under consideration, who had been authorised to carry out a prior review of requests for access to data, had not fulfilled the requirements of and . 86. …

… of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), the obligation for the administration to give reasons for its decisions (judgments of 22 November 2012, M., C-277/11, EU:C:2012:744, paragraph 83, and of 4 April 2019, OZ v EIB, C-558/17 P, EU:C:2019:289, paragraph 52). …

… In so doing, the decision not to promote was allegedly adopted in breach of 41 of the and of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, assessed in the light of Article 7 of the Charter, Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and the general implementing provisions of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations of 16 December 2013, published in Administrative Notice No 55-2013 of 19 December 2013 (‘the GIP’). 54 Since the alleged irregularities, set out in the second complaint, arise, according to …

… Under 86(3) of those rules, in cases brought pursuant to 270 TFEU, the modification of the application must be made by separate document and within the time limit laid down in 91(3) of the Staff Regulations within which the annulment of the measure justifying the modification of the application may be sought. 28 Thus, when an implied decision is replaced by an explicit decision, after bringing an action, the applicant may request the annulment of the explicit decision by filing …

… May associations of judges and prosecutors established with the object of promoting an , and efficient judicial system (2) rely on 2 and 19(1) TEU, read in the light of 12 and of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), to establish their locus standi to bring an action in furtherance of those aims before a national court? Legal framework - national legislation 2. …

… That latter provision must therefore be taken into consideration when interpreting the second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU. (23) Under of the , everyone whose rights guaranteed by EU law are violated is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law. (24) 29. …

… The referring court asks, in essence, whether 2 and 19(1) TEU, read in the light of 12 and of the , preclude national rules on locus standi that require associations of judges to demonstrate that they have a legitimate private interest (19) in actions seeking to annul acts that they allege are incompatible with judicial and the rule of law. (20) 25. …

… - Single and continuous infringement - Geographic scope of that infringement - ‘Hybrid procedure’ leading successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision at the end of a standard procedure - 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to good administration - of the European Commission - Assessment of the geographic scope of a concerted practice - Relevant evidence - Classification of a series of acts as a ‘single and continuous …

… Scania’s national distributors sell the trucks that are bought from the headquarters to dealers which are either wholly owned subsidiaries or companies. …

… parties constituted a single and continuous infringement of 101(1) TFEU and 53 of the EEA Agreement for the period between 17 January 1997 and 18 January 2011. …

… 4 of the . 33. …

… nationals such as QY would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, within the meaning of 4 of the . 40. …

… . According to the first sentence of 78(1) TFEU, the European Union is to develop a common policy on asylum, subsidiary protection and temporary protection. For this purpose, the European Parliament and the Council are to adopt, pursuant to 78(2)(a) and (b) TFEU, measures for a CEAS. …

… In paragraph 73 of that judgment, the Court interpreted the expression ‘ review body’, within the meaning of the second subparagraph of 2a(2) of Directive 89/665, as referring to an and tribunal previously established by law, within the meaning of of the . …

… In that context, observance of the right of such a tenderer to effective judicial protection requires that the body ruling on the lawfulness of the exclusion of that tenderer be an and tribunal previously established by law, within the meaning of of the . 68 However, those considerations do not apply with respect to the review body of first instance referred to in Article 2(3) of Directive 89/665. …

… However, that latter body cannot be considered to be a court or tribunal. 30 Consequently, if, as is apparent from the judgment of 21 December 2021, Randstad Italia (C-497/20, EU:C:2021:1037, paragraph 73), it should be held that the review body, under 2(3) or 2a(2) of Directive 89/665, must be a court or tribunal for the purposes of of the , the Czech legislation which allows a public contract to be concluded immediately after the decision of the President …

… 88 and 91(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. 25 By order of 30 January 2023, the General Court ordered the Commission, on the basis of the first paragraph of 24 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and 91(b), 92(3) and 103 of the Rules of Procedure, to produce the full version of the draft presentation for the decision on the application for approval of carbendazim for use in TP 7 and TP 10 attached to the email from …

… 28 of Directive 98/8 (‘the standing committee’), the question was discussed whether the contested draft regulation should provide for restrictions on the use of biocidal products and treated containing carbendazim. …

… specifications and conditions relating to the authorisation of biocidal products and treated were met. …

… Each Party shall, within the framework of its national legislation, ensure that members of the public concerned: (a) having a sufficient interest or, alternatively, (b) maintaining impairment of a right, where the administrative procedural law of a Party requires this as a precondition, have access to a review procedure before a court of law and/or another and body established by law, to challenge the substantive and procedural legality of any decision, act or omission subject …

… Furthermore, that court states that it is not certain that Articles 451 to 453 of the Code of Civil Procedure contain sufficient criteria to enable a person governed by private law to assess and predict the high costs of litigation. 34 In those circumstances, the Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureş (Court of Appeal, Târgu-Mureş) decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling: ‘(1) Are [the first paragraph of Article of the of …

… to the provisions of 6 and, where so provided for under national law and without prejudice to paragraph 3 below, of other relevant provisions of this Convention. …

… For the purpose of applying and complying with the principle of non-refoulement under 21(1) of Directive 2011/95, in conjunction with 19 of the [ of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (“the ”)], does the personal situation of an applicant for international protection come within the scope of the interpretation given in … the judgment of 19 March 2019, Jawo (C-163/17, EU:C:2019:218) concerning extreme material poverty under 4 of the [], in the light …

… 2013/32/EU - 40 - Subsequent application for international protection - Obligation to reassess elements relating to that general situation which were already examined - 19(2) of the - Principle of non-refoulement) I. …

… The information provided in the case file before the Court indicates that the DAB rejected their first applications due to their failure to meet the general criteria necessary in order to obtain refugee status, as set out under that directive and, in particular, 5(1) and 6 thereof. That rejection was, thus, not founded on the lex specialis contained in that 12(1)(a). . …