search

… That would be incompatible with the fundamental right to effective judicial protection provided for in the first paragraph of of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’) and with 263 TFEU. 5. …

… devoid of purpose and loss of interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Manifest inadmissibility - Effective legal protection - of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) I. …

… The second decision, after all, can itself form the subject of an action for annulment provided that it produces legal effects (see point et seq. below). 44. …

… It also infringes 124 of the EU-BH Agreement, as well as 21 of the , read in conjunction with 51 thereof. …

… The appeal 43 In support of its appeal, the appellant relies on seven grounds of appeal claiming (i) infringement of 263 TFEU, Regulations Nos 883/2013 and 1049/2001, as well as a failure to state reasons and contradictory reasoning in the examination of the admissibility of the action for annulment; (ii) infringement of 124 of the EU-BH Agreement, 7(2) and (4) of Protocol 5, 21 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’) read in conjunction …

… According to the appellant, a complaints procedure was introduced pursuant to 17(7) of that regulation, read in the light of recital of that regulation. …

… 25 Lastly, the referring court expresses doubts with regard, in particular, to the question of standing to bring proceedings on the basis of status as an extended collective licensing organisation, as to how 4(c) of Directive 2004/48 is to be interpreted in the light of, first, the protection of property laid down in 17 of the and, secondly, the right to an effective remedy under of the . …

… Söderlund, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 11 May 2023, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of 4(c) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45, and corrigenda OJ 2004 L 195, p. 16, and OJ 2007 L 204, p. 27) and 17 and of the of Fundamental Rights …

… Member States shall ensure that disputes between collective management organisations and users concerning, in particular, existing and proposed licensing conditions or a breach of contract can be submitted to a court, or if appropriate, to another and dispute resolution body where that body has expertise in intellectual property law. 2. …

… Those provisions are 2 TEU, 6(1) and (3) TEU and the second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with of the . 35. …

… of the are prima facie not relevant, since EU law is not being implemented within the meaning of 51(1) of the in the criminal case being heard by the referring court. (16) 36. …

… same as that required under 51(1) of the . …

… circumstances, to a violation of the guarantees of and within the meaning of 45 § 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and 6 § 1 of the [Convention]. 3. …

… That notwithstanding, the politicisation of courts departs from the criteria of and of courts required under Union law and international law, in particular of the and 6 § 1 [of the Convention]. That, in turn, causes uncertainty about the recognition of judgments of Polish courts in the Union space of freedom, justice and security. …

… within the meaning of 45 of the Constitution, Article of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see paragraph 83 above). …

… Next, in the referring court’s view, the exclusion provided for by the national legislation is questionable in the light of the principle of equal treatment, enshrined in 20 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). …

… and Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques, C-673/20, EU:C:2022:449, paragraph 40 and the case-law cited). 17 Secondly, under the second paragraph of 252 TFEU, the Advocate General, acting with complete and , is to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on cases which, in accordance with the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, require his or her involvement. …

… Lastly, the referring court states that that exclusion is likely to restrict the freedom to broadcast, provided for in 11 of the . 13 In those circumstances the Landgericht Erfurt (Regional Court, Erfurt, Germany) decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling: ‘(1) Must Directive 2001/29/EC be interpreted as meaning that broadcasting organisations are entitled, directly and originally, to the right to the fair …

… with 10 of that regulation and may therefore lead to a prohibition. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber) 22 November 2023 (*) (REACH - Substance 2-ethylhexyl salicylate - Exclusive use for the manufacture of cosmetic products - Checking the conformity of registrations - Request for additional toxicity studies - 41 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Prohibition of animal testing - 18(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 - 2(4)(b), 14(5)(b) of Regulation No 1907/2006 and Section 3 of Annex - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest …

… The competent authorities of two Member States proposed amendments, in accordance with 51(2) of the REACH Regulation. 8 On 10 November 2017, the applicant submitted its comments on those proposed amendments, in accordance with 51(5) of the REACH Regulation. 9 On 13 March 2018, the ECHA adopted the initial decision, following the unanimous agreement of the ECHA Member State Committee and in accordance with 51(6) of the REACH Regulation. …

… Those rights guaranteed by the EU legal order in administrative procedures include, in particular, the principle of sound administration, enshrined in 41(2)(a) of the of Fundamental Rights, which entails the duty of the competent institution to examine carefully and all the relevant aspects of the individual case. …

… The SRB decided, on a preliminary basis, that it was not required to pay compensation to the affected shareholders and creditors pursuant to 76(1)(e) of Regulation No 806/2014. 15 In order for it to be able to take a final decision on whether the affected shareholders and creditors should be granted compensation, the SRB invited them to express their interest in exercising their right to be heard with respect to the preliminary decision, in accordance with 41(2)(a) of the …

… , as defined in 18(1) of Regulation No 806/2014, were met. 6 On 6 June 2017, the Valuer submitted to the SRB a second valuation (‘Valuation 2’), drawn up pursuant to 20(10) of Regulation No 806/2014. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber) 22 November 2023 (*) (Civil service - Officials - Decision opening an invalidity procedure - Claim for annulment - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility - Psychological harassment - Administrative investigation - 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Rejection of the request - 24 of the Staff Regulations - Rule of correspondence - Principle of good administration - Right to be heard - Rules of evidence - Prima …

… In support of those assertions, by document lodged with the Court Registry on 13 June 2023, she submitted various documents which, according to her, showed a lack of on the part of the person who had informed her of the decision opening the invalidity procedure. 41 In the first place, the Commission raises several pleas of inadmissibility in that regard. …

… The applicant replied on 6 July 2020. 15 On 1 August 2020, the applicant lodged a request for assistance with the competent appointing authority, pursuant to 24, 59 and 60 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’). …

… JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber) 15 November 2023 (*) (Civil service - Officials - Reassignment in the interests of the service - Decision with retroactive effect adopted to comply with judgments of the European Union judicature - 266 TFEU - 22a and 22c of the Staff Regulations - Irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure - Principle of good administration - Right to be heard - Principle of - Reasonable time - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials …

… In addition, he requested that the confidentiality guaranteed by the Staff Regulations for cases of that kind be respected. 37 By email of 4 June 2021, a person from unit DG HR.E2 stated that the complaint lodged by the applicant on the basis of 22c of the Staff Regulations would be dealt with by that unit, in accordance with 90(2) of the Staff Regulations and as was made clear by Administrative Notice No 79-2013 of 19 December 2013 concerning the submission of requests under …

… his Sysper 2 file the third reassignment decision and all the references to 22a of the Staff Regulations concerning the reassignment decisions. …