search

… All property types relevant to the residential and livelihood needs of displaced persons should be within their jurisdiction, including homes, agricultural land and business properties; 10.7. secure the , and expertise of adjudicatory bodies, including through appropriate rules on their composition that may provide for the inclusion of international members. ...” 164. …

… Alleged violation of 6 § 1 of the Convention VII. Alleged violation of 13 in conjunction with different of the Convention under which the applicants complained VIII. Alleged violation of 14 in conjunction with 8 of the Convention and 1 of Protocol no. 1 IX. Application of 41 of the Convention A. Damage 1. …

… The of the Public Registry was approved by Order no. 835 of the Minister of Justice of Georgia of 19 July 2004. Subsequently, the Law on the State Registry and the were repealed on 27 April 2016 and 16 May 2016 respectively. A new of the Public Registry was adopted under Order no. 134 of the Ministry of Justice of Georgia of 3 May 2016. …

… In particular, the Commission shall monitor the implementation of the plan for the use and dissemination of foreground, submitted pursuant to the second subparagraph of 20(1). For those purposes, the Commission may be assisted by experts appointed in accordance with 17. … 3. …

… It further states that it was not aware of the reasons for the termination of its participation in the grant agreement nor of the complaints made against it, which constitutes an infringement of Article 41 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), Article 296 TFEU and Article 37 of Regulation No 1906/2006. …

… that decision be attached to the appeal (see, to that effect, judgment of 14 November 2017, British Airways v Commission, C-122/16 P, EU:C:2017:861, paragraphs and 48). 57 Thus, the fact that the judgment under appeal was not attached to the appeal cannot result in the latter being declared inadmissible. …

… of 19(1) [TEU], in conjunction with of the [], be interpreted as meaning that a court of first instance of a Member State …, the formation of which is composed of a single judge of that court assigned to hear a case in flagrant breach of the provisions of national law on the allocation of cases and the appointment and modification of the formations of a court, does not constitute an and tribunal previously established by law which ensures effective …

… 19(2) TEU, read in the light of 2 TEU and of of the , requires that compliance with those rules may be subject to judicial review. 68 It follows that national legislation which prevents appellate courts from reviewing compliance with the national rules on the reallocation of cases within the courts or the modification of formations of the courts, in order to determine whether the formation of the court which ruled at first instance constitutes an and …

… Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law. … …’ Polish law The Code of Civil Procedure 6 (1) of the ustawa Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (Code of Civil Procedure) of 17 November 1964 (Dz. U. No 43, item 296), in its consolidated version (Dz. …

… In accordance with milestone F1G, a number of measures must be taken in order to reinforce the and of judges in Poland. In accordance with milestone F2G, measures must be taken in order to guarantee that the judges affected by decisions of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) (‘the Disciplinary Chamber’) have access to proceedings to review decisions of that chamber affecting them. …

… the European Commission pursuant to 15(2) and 23(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (OJ 2021 L 57, p. 17). …

… , pursuant to 18(1) of Regulation 2021/241. 6 Following a positive assessment of the recovery and resilience plan by the Commission and on a proposal from it, the Council approves, by means of an implementing decision, the assessment of that plan, pursuant to 20(1) of Regulation 2021/241. 7 The implementing decision makes the payment of a financial contribution subject to compliance with conditions, those being the implementation of that plan, including the achievement of milestones …

… 90(2) or, where applicable, 91(1) of the Staff Regulations. …

… The third plea in law, alleging breach of the right to be heard and of the obligation to state reasons 21 In the first part of his third plea, the applicant submits inter alia that, by the decision of 28 February 2023, the selection board infringed his right to be heard, as enshrined in 41(2)(a) of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’), by failing to consider all the arguments in his request for review and by examining arguments which he had not raised. …

… The selection board therefore failed to provide reasons for that decision, in breach of the second paragraph of 296 TFEU, of 41(2)(c) of the and of the ‘Code of good administrative behaviour for staff of the European Commission in their relations with the public’, annexed to Commission Decision 2000/633/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 17 October 2000 amending its Rules of Procedure (OJ 2000 L 267, p. 63; ‘the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour’). - The first part of the third plea …

… and of the Council of 31 March 2004 (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 34), for a generic medicinal product within the meaning of 10(2)(b) of that directive. …

… A copy of that letter was sent to the Commission. 46 On 12 December 2019, the CHMP adopted a positive opinion, recommending the grant of a marketing authorisation for Dexmedetomidine Accord. On the same day, the EMA published the EPAR on Dexmedetomidine Accord, which summarised the scientific assessment which it had carried out between 28 December 2018 and 12 December 2019. …

… Moreover, the applicant requested that the Commission adopt measures to establish that Dexdor was entitled to the whole of the regulatory data protection period provided for by 10(1) of Directive 2001/83 and 14(11) of Regulation No 726/2004 (‘the RDP period’). 34 In its reply of 24 July 2015, the Commission stated that the EMA would examine compliance with the RDP period at the time of the submission of an application for marketing authorisation for a generic medicinal product in …

… In making that assessment, they are bound by Denmark’s international obligations on the right to respect for family and private life as set out in, inter alia, 8 of the Convention and 7 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2007/C 303/01). 25. The conditions that an applicant must fulfil to enter Denmark are set out in Chapter 4 of the Executive Order on Visas (see paragraph 23 above). …

… The Court points out in this connection that where and domestic courts have carefully examined the facts, applying the relevant human rights standards consistently with the Convention and its case-law, and adequately weighed up the applicant’s personal interests against the more general public interest in the case, it is not for the Court to substitute its own assessment of the merits (including, in particular, its own assessment of the factual details of proportionality) for …

… The District Court’s reasoning regarding the sentence and the expulsion order was as follows: “[The applicant] is sentenced to imprisonment for a term of two years and three months – see 245 § 1, read with 247 § 1, of the Penal Code. …

… Admissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling 17 Company C expresses doubts as to whether the referring body, composed of Judge T.S. alone, is an and tribunal previously established by law within the meaning of the second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU, read in the light of of the , given the circumstances in which that judge was appointed to the Civil Chamber. …

… his or her and in the case in question, in the context of a “test of [ and] ” or an application for recusal of the judge?’ …

… case-law on the interpretation of the second subparagraph of 19(1) TEU, read in the light of the second paragraph of of the , various findings and assessments made by the European Court of Human Rights in the judgment of 8 November 2021, Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v. …

… (11 ) of the Law states that “The High Council of Justice of Georgia is accountable before the Conference of Judges of Georgia”, which is not sufficient for this purpose. Accountability of the HCJ to the Conference of Judges appears problematic as reflecting excessive corporatism and self-governance of the judicial sector. The HCJ should be an body with a substantial participation of non-judicial members. …

… The Decision set out a list of the following elements of the integrity criterion for judicial candidates with judicial experience: (a) personal integrity and professional conscience; (b) , , and sense of justice; (c) personal and professional behaviour; (d) personal and professional reputation; and (e) financial obligations. …

… The chamber notes that ... the elements of the integrity criterion for a judicial candidate with judicial experience are the following: (a) personal integrity and professional conscience; (b) , , and sense of justice; (c) personal and professional behaviour; (d) personal and professional reputation; and (e) financial obligations. …

… The request for access was based on 6(1) of Decision 2004/258/EC of the European Central Bank of 4 March 2004 on public access to European Central Bank documents (OJ 2004 L 80, p. 42), as last amended by Decision (EU) 2015/529 of the European Central Bank of 21 January 2015 (OJ 2015 L 84, p. 64), and on 41(2)(b) and 42 of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the ’). 7 On 27 July 2022, in reply to the request for access, the ECB adopted the contested …

… JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber) 6 November 2024 (*) (Access to documents - Decision 2004/258/EC - ECB’s assessment that Sberbank banka was failing or likely to fail - Refusal to grant access - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Admissibility - 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 - Supervised entity - Shareholders’ rights of defence - 41 of the of Fundamental Rights - Right of access to the ECB …

… Admitting that the legality of measures denying access to the file could be challenged of the judicial review of the decision closing the administrative procedure would wrongly transform the right to access the file into an right, that is to say, into a right having an ‘end in itself’. 20 The ECB also argues that effective judicial protection is guaranteed in the present case by the indirect judicial review of the contested decision carried out in the context of the action …