search

… Sixthly, the applicants’ conduct is not entirely divorced from the build-up of a delay in Cases T-76/06 and T-78/06. 60 In that regard, it should be noted that the second paragraph of of the of Fundamental Rights provides in particular that ‘everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law’. 61 Such a right, the existence of which had been affirmed before the entry into force of the …

… Moreover, that duration cannot be accounted for by the conduct of the parties, in so far as the written stage of the proceedings in Case T-385/06 was completed 10 months after the application was lodged. 31 The Court of Justice of the European Union disputes those claims. 32 In that regard, it should be noted that the second paragraph of of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides in particular that ‘everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable …

… time by an and tribunal previously established by law’. 33 Such a right, the existence of which had been affirmed before the entry into force of the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a general principle of EU law, was held to be applicable in the context of proceedings brought against a Commission decision (see judgment of 16 July 2009, Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland v Commission, C-385/07 P, EU:C:2009:456, paragraph 178 and the case-law cited). 34 In the present …

… Moreover, the limited term of office of the judges and the long period of sickness of one of the members of the chamber to which Case T-54/06 had been allocated must also be taken into account. 44 In that regard, it should be noted that the second paragraph of of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides in particular that ‘everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by …

… , which provides, under its first paragraph, that everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by EU law are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in that and, under its second paragraph, which corresponds to Article 6(1) ECHR, that everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law (judgment of 28 February 2013, review of the …

… According to the applicants, if, in the present case, the sum of EUR 20 000 awarded to them by the Court as compensation for non-material damage were ‘neutralised’ by the costs that remained to be borne by them, this would amount to a denial of justice. 47 The Commission disputes those arguments. 48 It should be recalled, first of all, that the principle of effective judicial protection is a general principle of EU law to which expression is now given by of the of Fundamental Rights …

… of the of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides in particular that ‘everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law’. 60 Such a right, the existence of which had been affirmed before the entry into force of the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a general principle of EU law, was held to be applicable in the context of proceedings brought against a Commission decision (see judgment …

… 06 and the period between the end of the written part of the procedure and the opening of the oral part of the procedure in those cases are justified by the complexity of the latter, the limited importance of the dispute to the applicants, the conduct of the applicants, the limited term of office of the judges and the long period of sickness of one of the members of the chamber to which the two cases at issue had been allocated. 59 In that regard, it should be noted that the second paragraph of …

… In fact, in addition to making judicial protection available for all EU law, the second paragraph of of the recognises that everyone is entitled to a fair ‘hearing’ by an and tribunal, where 6(1) of the ECHR restricts the concept of a hearing to the determination of civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge. 66. …

… The 5. of the , entitled ‘Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial’, provides as follows: ‘Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this . Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law. …

… Furthermore, to my mind that intention to authorise the automatic application of of the where the is itself applicable is enshrined in the use of the expression ‘hearing’ in the second paragraph. 65. …

… A plea of that kind cannot therefore be fully effective in the context of an administrative appeal procedure (judgment in CR v Parliament, EU:F:2014:38, paragraph 40). 48 Thirdly and lastly, the [Civil Service Tribunal] points out that the principle of effective judicial protection is a general principle of EU law to which expression is now given by the second paragraph of of the , pursuant to which “[e]veryone is entitled to a … hearing … by an and tribunal …

… That paragraph corresponds to 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950 (“the ECHR”) (review judgment in Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB, C-334/12 RX-II, EU:C:2013:134, paragraphs 40 and 42). 49 According to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on the interpretation of Article 6(1) of the ECHR, to which reference must be made in accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter, the exercise of …

… The 5. Under , entitled ‘Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial’: ‘Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law. …

… The 4. Under , entitled ‘Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial’: ‘Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law. …

… The 4. Under , entitled ‘Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial’: ‘Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article. Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and tribunal previously established by law. …