search

… He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 6. The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 51-57, 20 September 2016, with further references). 7. …

… The applicant complained of the lack of of the in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 5. The applicant complained of the lack of of the in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. …

… The Court notes that in the present case the complaints concerning the “ by ” and “ and ” requirements stem from the same underlying problem of an inherently deficient procedure for judicial appointments to the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court. …

… POLAND (Application no. 35599/20) JUDGMENT Art 6 § 1 (civil) • Grave irregularities in appointment of judges to newly Supreme Court’s Disciplinary Chamber, that suspended judge from duties for verifying of another judge appointed upon recommendation of reformed National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ) • Very essence of the right to a “ by ” impaired • and of Disciplinary Chamber compromised • Application of Reczkowicz v. …

… Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and previously by . ...” Case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union Judgment of 19 November 2019 in A.K. and Others ( of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court), C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18, EU:C:2019:982 120. …

… Article 6, in so far as relevant, reads: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 106. The Court has found above that the applicant’s extradition to China would result in a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see paragraph 84 above). …

… Consequently, having regard to the nature of the extradition proceedings, whose aim is to ensure that the prosecution of the applicant would be pursued in another State, and the unjustified delays in the Polish proceedings, the Court finds that the applicant’s detention was not “” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention and that there has therefore been a violation of that provision. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 105. …

… The Court, being the master of the characterisation to be given in to the facts of any case before it (see Akdeniz v. Turkey, no. 25165/94, § 88, 31 May 2005), considers that these complaints fall to be examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention which reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 7. …

… In other words, the “” and “” requirements/guarantees are intrinsic and inseparable qualities related to the very existence of “a by ”. It is impossible to examine the qualities of a that does not exist, just as it is impossible to examine the qualities of a non‑existent person or building. Therefore, any hope that a is and will hinge on the fact that it is a by in the first place. …

… Subsequently, the Court noted that although the right to a “ by ” was a stand‑alone right under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, a very close interrelationship had been formulated in the Court’s case-law between that specific right and the guarantees of “” and “”. …

… The relevant part of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by .” Admissibility The parties’ submissions 62. …

… They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 ““In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 7. The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v. …

… THE JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 6. The applicants complained of the lack of of the in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. …

… They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 ““In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” 7. The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v. …

… THE JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 6. The applicants complained of the lack of of the in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. …

… ., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing ... by an and by .” Admissibility The parties’ submissions (a) The Government 119. The Government argued that KTB had failed to exhaust domestic remedies. …

… The applicant further complained that the rejection of the additional grounds of appeal on points of violated his right to a fair trial as provided for in Article 6 of the Convention, which in relevant parts reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an and by .” Admissibility 65. …

… ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION ON ACCOUNT OF THE rejection OF THE ADDITIONAL GrOUNDS OF APPEAL ON POINTS OF 64. …

… The applicant invoked Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) of the Convention, which provides, in so far as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an and by ... 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: (b) to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence ...” Admissibility 15. …