search

… The obligation to provide information under Article 12 of (EU) / is deemed to be fulfilled by the placing of an information board in a sufficiently visible place, indicating at least the existence of the processing, the identity of the person responsible and the possibility of exercising the rights provided for by Articles 15 to 22 of (EU) /. ...” 53. As regards video-surveillance in the workplace, section 89(1) of the Law provides as follows: “1. …

… Subject matter of the case before the 74. In their oral observations before the , the Government requested that the Court should only re-examine the complaint under Article 8 of the Convention, in respect of which the had found a violation in its judgment of 9 January 2018 and which was the subject of the Government’s request for referral, as accepted by the panel of the . …

… On 27 March 2018, under Article 43 of the Convention, the Government requested the referral of the case to the . On 28 May 2018 the panel of the granted that request. 6. The composition of the was determined in accordance with Article 26 §§ 4 and 5 of the Convention and Rule 24. 7. The applicants and the Government each filed further written observations (Rule 59 § 1). …

… On those grounds, the Court ( ) hereby rules: 1. …

… /: ‘1. …

… The questions referred must therefore be answered having regard to both Directive 95/46 and /. …

… On those grounds, the Court ( ) hereby rules: 1. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE COURT ( ) 24 September 2019 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Personal data - Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data contained on websites - Directive 95/46/EC - (EU) / - Search engines on the internet - Processing of data appearing on websites - Special categories of data referred to in Article 8 of Directive 95/46 and Articles 9 and 10 of / - Applicability of those articles to operators of …

… 95/46 and Article 10 of /, is subject to special restrictions. …

… JUDGMENT OF THE COURT ( ) 24 September 2019 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Personal data - Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of such data - Directive 95/46/EC - (EU) / - Internet search engines - Processing of data on web pages - Territorial scope of the right to de-referencing) In Case C-507/17, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France), made by decision of 19 July 2017 …

… /, entitled ‘Territorial scope’, is worded as follows: ‘1. …

… On those grounds, the Court ( ) hereby rules: On a proper construction of Article 12(b) and subparagraph (a) of the first paragraph of Article 14 of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and of Article 17(1) of (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals …

… On 25 May 2018 the General Data Protection ( (EU) / on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC) entered into force. Like the Directive it replaced, the Regulation does not apply to State activities concerning public safety, defence and State security (Article 2(2)). THE LAW I.  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION 82.   …

… SWEDEN (Application no. 35252/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 19 June 2018 Referral to the 04/02/2019 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Branko Lubarda, President, Helena Jäderblom, Helen Keller, Pere Pastor Vilanova, Alena Poláčková, Georgios A. …

… In joined cases Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others (cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, judgment of 21 December 2016), the CJEU ( ) dealt, firstly, with the issue of a provider of electronic communications services having refused to retain data under Swedish legislation that had given effect to the now invalid Directive 2006/24/EC. The CJEU stated, inter alia, the following: “107.   …

… (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119/1, p. 1), entered into force on 24 May 2016. When it takes effect (25 May 2018), it will replace the Data Protection Directive. …

… Directive 95/46/EC and (EU) / 53. Article 2 (1) (a) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31, hereinafter “the Data Protection Directive”) provides that “personal data” means “any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (‘data subject’)”. …

… More recently, the concept was mentioned in the case of Bărbulescu v. Romania[9]. The case concerned the applicant’s dismissal following the monitoring of his electronic communications, mainly through his Yahoo Messenger account, which the applicant was instructed to create for communicating with clients. It was found that he used the Internet for personal purposes during the working day, in violation of internal rules. …

… The dissenting opinion of Judge Pinto de Albuquerque was annexed to the judgment. 5. On 12 April 2016 the applicant requested the referral of the case to the in accordance with Article 43 of the Convention and Rule 73. On 6 June 2016 a panel of the accepted the request. 6. The composition of the was determined in accordance with Article 26 §§ 4 and 5 of the Convention and Rule 24. …

… (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), published in OJ 2016 L 119/1, entered into force on 24 May 2016 and will repeal Directive 95/46/EC with effect from 25 May 2018 (Article 99). …

… CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA (Application no. 61496/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 5 September 2017 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Bărbulescu v. …

… (EU) / 67. (EU) / of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119/1) entered into force on 24 May 2016. It will repeal Directive 95/46/EC as of 25 May 2018 (see Article 99). 68. …

… On 21 October 2015 the applicant companies requested the referral of the case to the in accordance with Article 43 of the Convention. On 14 December 2015 the panel of the granted that request. 5. The composition of the was determined according to the provisions of Article 26 §§ 4 and 5 of the Convention and Rule 24 of the Rules of Court. …

… In the present case, no documentary evidence supporting the claim for legal fees before the has been submitted to the Court, as required by Rule 60 § 2 of the Rules of Court. The additional claim for costs and expenses incurred in the proceedings before the must thus be rejected. …